Sunday, 28 September 2025

The Ignatius Jesuit College rose from the ashes

On 1 May 1959, a brief sod-turning ceremony was held on a hilltop just north of Guelph. Monsignor Rt. Rev. W.J. Hawkins, of St. Joseph’s Parish, Guelph, shoveled a clod of earth from the ground as Rev. Edward J. Sherry of Toronto made a short speech. Sherry's remarks outlined the history of the Jesuit order in Canada, leading to the foundation of the Jesuit novitiate, St. Stanislaus, on this site in 1913. Following a destructive blaze in 1954, the old novitiate building had burned to the ground. But, a new Jesuit college was set to rise, like a phoenix, from its ashes.
("Turns College sod—Rt. Rev. W.H. Hawkins of Guelph yesterday turned the sod for the addition to Ignatius College, Guelph. Construction is expecting to start within a week or 10 days with completion in September 1960." From Kitchener-Waterloo Record, 2 May 1959; courtesy of University of Waterloo, Special Archives and Collections 59-12810.)

To understand the significance of this event, it would help, as Rev. Sherry suggested, to note how the Jesuits came to operate a school north of Guelph in the first place.

Induction into the Society of Jesus is a lengthy process. However, it often begins with two years as a "novice" undergoing spiritual training, followed by two years in the "juniorate," undergoing academic instruction. This may lead to university studies and further tuition in religous philosophy as well as practical experience.

At the turn of the 20th century, Jesuit novices in Canada were instructed at the Pedro Aruppe Novitiate in Montreal. It was decided that English-speaking novices would be better served at a different location in an English-speaking facility. A site just north of Guelph was chosen. Guelph had strong connections with the Jesuits, who ran the prominent Church of Our Lady in the city, so this link may have recommended the locale to the order.

("Jesuit Novitiate, Guelph, Ont." Printed by J.L. Pinsonnault Co. of St. Jean Quebec, ca. 1920. Note the third storey added to the top of the original "Mount Tara.")

A 280-acre farm known as "Mount Tara" was bought from Thomas Bedford and the impressive house was expanded, with a third storey and several new wings added on the back over the years. Neighbouring properties were also added as the instituion grew. A large, three-storey dormitory was added on in 1933 to accommodate the growing student body, which provided some welcome local employment during the Great Depression.

("St. Stanislaus Novitiate, Guelph, Ont." Looking at the other end of the original novitiate. Real photo postcard published by local photographer Lionel O'Keefe, ca. 1920.)

Besides training Jesuit priests, the location of the novitiate on a farm meant that agriculture became part of the job at Ignatius. Unlike Benedictines or Trappists, who typically live in monastaries integrated with farms where wines or cheeses may be produced, Jesuits are more academic in orientation, so farming was more-or-less an accident for the establishment north of Guelph. Nonetheless, agriculture quickly assumed a central role, the farm producing much of the food consumed at the novitiate, while the novices assisted with farming operations.

("Aerial Photograph of the Jesuit Novitiate, circa 1945." Note the front, three-storey facade of the original novitiate building at the right end of central group of buildings. Since the access road approaches the novitiate straight from the highway, this photo should be dated before 1932. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums 2014.84.679.)

An article in the 1 September 1951 Kitchener-Waterloo Record describes the farm then as follows:

The order’s property includes 550 acres, of which 187 acres is under cultivation. There are 55 acres in pasture, 33 acres of summer fallow, 105 acres of marginal land, eight acres in wheat, seven acres in rye, 72 acres in oats, 47 in hay, 20 acres in corn, three acres in potatoes, and 2.5 acres of garden, including a greenhouse.
The orchard included 17 acres of apples, eight acres of pears, and a one-acre experimental plot where various new varieties of fruits are being developed in co-operation with the Ontario Agricultural College. All grain is used for feeding the farm’s livestock. Except for a certain amount of milk sold in order to buy prepared meats, all farm produce is used to feed the community.
There was a herd of about 250 Holsteins and Herefords cows, of which about 35 provided the milk.

The farming operation was run by lay brothers, that is, men who joined the Jesuit order but did not aim to become priests. One such man noted in several sources was Brother Ben Reischman, who performed plumbing, electrical and carpentry work for the novitiate although his passion was the orchard. As a lay brother, Reischman did not have a salary but worked for room and board, with the order undertaking to look after him upon his retirement.

Besides assisting with the farm, novices were assigned other duties both on the grounds and off. Some of these were noted in the local papers, as when the novices built a new road leading to the novitiate from Highway 6 in 1932, the old one being a direct lane in a straight line from the highway with the new one being the still-familiar S-shaped route past the neighbouring Marymount Cemetery. In 1943, novices were sent to downtown Guelph to offload 800 to 1000-pound bales of wool that were brought to town for the manufacturing of war materials. Assisting at local Catholic schools, St. Joseph's Hospital, the Ontario Reformatory, etc., were also regular assignments.

Perhaps the most exciting gig was forming a posse to search the grounds for a man who had stolen a taxi cab in Kitchener in 1948, was run off the road by police on the highway in front of the novitiate and then escaped pursuit on foot. The novices helped police to scour the grounds but the suspect was not found. He was later located in Sudbury and brought to Kitchener for trial.

Accounts of instruction at the novitiate portray it as challenging and disciplinarian. The purpose of the novitiate aimed at spiritual examination and instruction. William Johnson, who attended St. Stanislaus from 1949 to 1951, reports a rather isolating program geared toward conformity with the order's rules and outlook. Personal possessions were taken away and standard clothing issued. A rigid daily routine was followed, each activity being delineated by the ringing of a bell. Sounding of the bell was expected to bring an instant response:

You could tell the old novices from the new by the way they responded. If the bell rang in the middle of a sentence, the experienced novice would plunge into instant silence. A laugh was broken mid-guffaw. A written word was broken mid-letter.
Depending on the activity novitates were pursuing, the bell might be rung at intervals as long as half-an-hour or as short as two-and-one-half minutes.

Students were discouraged from forming personal attachments with each other. For example, students were not allowed to speak together in pairs, to prevent any sort of intimacy from forming. Groupings for conversation or other purposes were usually selected by authorities and not the novices themselves. Rules forbade novices from voicing doubts about the faith or continuation in training. Recommended topics included heaven and the good works of the Jesuits in Canada.

Most striking was the mortification of the flesh. Each novice was issued with small whip of knotted cords applied to the back or buttocks three times a week, to help instill "sexual continence." Similarly, novices were given a chain made of six looped lengths of wire that could be worn around the thigh or ankle. When worn, it chafed the skin sufficiently to constitute a form of penance.

(Stephen Carry (2007) gives a more detailed reminiscence of his time as a novice at St. Stanislaus, around the same time.)

These "old ways" at St. Stanislaus began to change, beginning with the big fire. Around 6:40pm on 18 November 1954, diners in the refectory noticed the smell of smoke, apparently coming from one of the nearby workshops. The alarm was raised and residents organized to evacuate people and valuable items from the old building complex. Rev. J.A. Leahy, an amputee, slid down a fire escape to safety. Statues from the chapel, constructed in 1923, were removed to a safe distance.

A kind of bucket brigade formed behind the chapel was items of food, clothing, and furniture were passed along and heaped up outside.

(Novitiate on fire, evening of 18 November 1954. Courtesy of University of Waterloo, Special Archives and Collections 54-5970.)

Efforts to fight the fire were complicated by its "chemical nature." Also, only one pumper truck from Guelph arrived in response to the alarm. The Novitiate was in the county and not the city, and city rules prevented a larger repsonse without special prior arrangement, which had not been made. The pumper connected a hose to the nearby pond on Marden Creek but the volume of water thus available was insufficient. The fire swept through the cellars, the chapel, the refectory and kitchen as well as the halls and parlors. By 8pm, the building was a "blazing beacon," visible as far away as Fergus, which produced a huge shower of burning embers.

The fire spread to the Noviatiate's hydro lines, producing a portentious sight (Mercury, 19 November 1954):

Vivid flashes of blue and white blazed out from broken power lines. One hydro pole was ignited by sparks and reared into the air in the shape of a fiery cross—its bolts and guy wires glistening white hot.
Naturally, nearby roads became clogged with the cars of curious onlookers.
(Aftermath of Novitiate fire. Courtesy of University of Waterloo, Special Archives and Collections 54-5970.)

By morning, all that remained of the chapel, workshops and many accommodations was two chimneys and a few teetering walls.

As a result, a temporary chapel, refectory, kitchen and library had to be incorporated into the remaining structures, and 86 men had to be housed in accommodations designed for 56.

("Novitiate model—Rev. J.P. Monaghan (right), Rector of Ignatius College, Guelph, who yesterday marked 50 years in the Jesuit order, shows a model of a proposed novitiate addition to Bishop Joseph F. Ryan of Hamilton." From Kitchener-Waterloo Record, 9 September 1959. Courtesy of University of Waterloo, Special Archives and Collections 59-12939.)

The Jesuit order decided to build anew. In 1957, the Jesuit Fund kicked off a campaign to raise over $1.3m to design and construct new buildings. The ceremonial sod turning followed the next year (as noted above) and construction began. The ceremonial laying of the cornerstone ensued on Friday, 13 November 1959, the stone being laid at the base of the new chapel and the silver trowel being wielded by His Excellency the Most Rev. J.F. Ryan, Bishop of Hamilton.

("'Inner Court; at Ignatius College. Guelph, Ontario." Published by Canadian Postcard Co., ca. 1960.)

Once construction was finished, an open house was held on 25 September 1960. Hundreds of guests were given tours of the new chapel, refectory and dining area, kitchen, classrooms, dormitory (with accommodation for 140), infirmary and library. (A new workshop had also been completed, which was connected to the main buildings by a tunnel, though this was not on the tour.)

("Ignatius College, Guelph, Ontario." Published by Canadian Postcard Co., ca. 1960.)

Besides the new buildings, the old St. Stanislaus Novitiate was reinaugurated as "Ignatius College." (In fact, the official change had occured the previous year through an act of Provincial Parliament.) The new college was affiliated with St. Mary's University, a university in Halifax also run by the Jesuits at the time.

("'The Chapel' at Ignatius College, Guelph, Ontario." Published by Canadian Postcard Co., ca. 1960.)

A series of postcards were printed to celebrate the new institution. The views on the cards showcased the updating of the new college through the modern design of its new buildings. Colour postcards were often used in this era to show off the modernity of the institutions they depicted, and renewed Ignatius College was no exception.

Changes did not stop with the novitiate's new name and structures. Williams (1969) remarks that the tenor of education there changed as a consequence of the Second Vatican Council of the mid-1960s. Under Pope John XXIII, the church underwent a process of updating, and the education of Jesuits was significantly affected. Williams lists some of the ways in which instruction of the novices had changed since his time:

They have done away with the discipline and the chain, the public self-accusations in the dining room and the informing. ... The ever-present cassock has almost disappeared. The novices might wear it to mass, but spend most time in casual clothes. The instant blind obedience to orders is a rueful memory to the new-style Master of Novices, Reverend John English. ... There is even a decision making house council, with novices represented. The lock step of old has been replaced by an individualized daily program, worked out between the novice and Father English. ... Television, radio, newspapers, magazines—even movies—penetrate today's Novitiate.
In addition, the novices spent their second year at the newly formed University of Guelph as full-time students. The Reverend John Wickham, who taught English at the College, observed that "there have been more changes in the Novitiate here in the last five years than there were in the whole 430-year history of the order."
("Loyola Retreat House, Guelph, Ontario." Published by Alex Wilson Publications Ltd., ca. 1970.)

A further alteration to the Novitiate was the establishment of the Loyola Retreat House in 1963. The existing Jesuit retreat house in Oakville had become a little too dear to maintain and was to be sold off to be converted to a municipal golf course. In addition, the Oakville site had itself been a converted manor house and was not especially well suited for the purposes of a retreat. So, a purpose-built facility in the amenable surroundings of Ignatius College was identified as a desirable replacement.

("Entrance to Loyola Retreat House, Guelph, Ontario." Published by Alex Wilson Publications Ltd., ca. 1970.)

As a result, plans were made for a 48-room house (soon extended to 72) featuring its own kitchen, dining, and rooming facilities. On 10 September 1963, the Very Rev. A.J. Macdougall, SJ, Provincial of the Jesuit Fathers of Upper Canada Province, wielded the shiny shovel and ceremonially turned over the sod on the site of the new structure. The timing seemed extra providential as the year was also the 50th anniversary of the founding of the Novitiate.

("Beautiful Loyola Chapel, Loyola Retreat House, Guelph, Ontario." Published by Alex Wilson Publications Ltd., ca. 1970.)

Appropriately, the new, modern Loyal Retreat facility was also celebrated with the issue of a set of postcards featuring both interior and exterior views.

("Loyola House Chapel, Guelph Centre of Spirituality." Published by Dexter Color, Canada Ltd., ca. 1970.)

The new Loyola Retreat House was fulsomely described in an article in the Kitchener-Waterloo Record (Taylor, 20 June 1964). The author comments that, "When the first retreatants walk through the main doors, they probably will be impressed with the architecture, strongly reminiscent of a Spanish monastery." Also discernable in the House's decor was a trend to modern simplicity: "the chapel is almost stark with none of the huge statues and massive altars of the past."

("Loyola Retreat House, Guelph, Ontario." Published by Alex Wilson Publications Ltd., ca. 1970. Note the many ashtrays!)

Of course, much of the attraction of the Retreat House is outside the building itself. The farm fields, woodlots, creek, gardens, and orchards of the farm provide many places well suited for the quiet contemplation integral to a retreat. As the Very Rev. Angus MacDougall, SJ, Provincial of the English Speaking Jesuits, stated at its official opening, the Retreat House offers “an opportunity to get away from it all over the weekends and let God speak to your soul" (Mercury, 29 June 1964).


Although Ignatius College represented a substantial adjustment of Jesuit training to modern times, the project was ultimately proved unsustainable. The high water mark was 1961, when the paint was still drying on the College, when the population of novices was about 90. The number declined as the years went by, there being only 8 in 1991. The College ceased operation as a novitiate in 1994. Two years later, the College buildings were reconstituted as "Orchard Park" and rented out to local groups and concerns compatible with the mission of the new Jesuit Centre.

Loyola House developed a set of spiritual retreats that proved popular and were undertaken by people from around the world. Beside programs offered by the House itself, interested groups could rent the facilities to run events organized for themselves. These events need not be Catholic in orientation (though the House did reject a women's spiritutality workshop in 1993 on the grounds that its celebration of Beltane was too pagan).

Unfortunately, both Orchard Park and the Loyola Retreat House have reached the end of the line. Orchard Park proved too expensive to maintain on the income derived from rentals and closed in June 2025. It will mostly likely be demolished. Loyola House is due to close at the end of the year.

The Jesuit Centre is engaged in re-envisioning its future. Its agricultural and ecological projects remain vital. Perhaps it will transform again.


Another event of historical interest connected with the St. Stanislaus Novitate was the so-called Guelph Novitiate Raid of 1918. Enjoy!
Works consulted for this post include:

Tuesday, 12 August 2025

The palace at Exhibition Park

The turnout surely gratified the organizers of the 38th Provincial Exhibition, not to mention many of the local townsfolk. On September 28, 1883, the Toronto Globe reported that at least 25,000 people attended Farmers' Day at the show. The venue was the Exhibition Grounds, now Exhibition Park, in Guelph. Attracted by the exhibits and events provided, and facilitated by special railway fares, crowds thronged the streets and jammed the local hotels. Given that Guelph's own population was around 11,000 at the time, it is easy to imagine how the Royal City, and its biggest park, must have seemed packed to the rafters.
("Guelph, Ont. - The Central Exhibition, View of the Grounds," reproduced in the Canadian Illustrated News v. 10, n. 14, p. 216; 8 October 1874. Besides the Palace, the horse-judging ring and stand can be seen at the left, with tents pitched in behind, while a band stand is on the right. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums 1974.33.4.)

It being Farmers' Day at the Exhibition, the main events concerned agriculture. Judges examined specimens from across the province in several categories, including breeds of cattle, sheep, and pigs. Also scrutinized were varieties of honey, sugar, bacon, apples, plums, peaches, grapes and other fruit, not to mention domestic wines and numerous dairy products. A contest among agricultural implements of all descriptions was also held. Besides these events, there was an essay contest and what might now be called a battle of the bands.

("Bird's eye view of the Guelph Exhibition Buildings and Grounds," ca. 1875. Kathleen Street is in the foreground. A legend enumerates many other buildings and features. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums.)

One feature of holding the show in Guelph was that farmers could make a short trip and inspect the Ontario Agricultural College on the hill south of town, where their sons might go to learn the latest in the agricultural arts.

("Detail of aerial plan of Guelph by H. Brosius, 1872." Rows of pens and stables can be seen right (north) of the Palace and along Exhibition Street (bottom) and Kathleen Street (top). The gatehouse at the corner of London Road and Exhibition Street can be seen near the left edge, with the horse-judging ring and stand just above. Courtesy of Wellington County Museum and Archives, A1985.110.)

Although every corner of the Exhibition grounds was full and the space contained many buildings and structures, arguably the most remarkable one there was the rotunda, sometimes referred to as "the Palace." It was a large, two-storey, octagonal wooden structure featuring four wings (later reduced to two). It had several functions during events like the Provincial Exhibition, such as to hold exhibits of items including stuffed birds, clothing, crockery, butter, and whatever else the occasion demanded. In addition, it could provide office space for event organizers, and the open central area could be used as a dance floor!

(The Main Building (Palace), stalls, and wicket of the old Exhibition Park. From Allan, D. (1939) "About Guelph: It's early days and later." Notice how drawings of the Palace tend to squash its central section; compare with photographs below.)

To understand the Palace, it helps to go back to the beginning of Exhibition Park itself. The initial layout of Guelph included a large Market Square in the middle of town. Its founder, John Galt, expected that Guelph would be the central point of an agricultural region and thus made this provision for market space. The Market Square, where the VIA station, City Hall, and Armory now stand, fulfilled that function but became too constrained by construction and the arrival of the Grand Trunk Railway right through the middle of the area to meet expanding demands for more exhibition space.

(Map of the Exhibition Grounds from the Illustrated Atlas of the County of Wellington, 1878, superimposed on a Google Maps image of the area as it is currently laid out. The Palace stood astride what is now the footpath across the park at Mont Street, roughly where the lavatories are today.)

As a result, exhibition organizers looked at properties outside of the central city for more room, and their eyes settled on the Catholic Glebe north of London Road. The glebe was a plot of land that was granted to the Catholic Church in Guelph in order to support it through development, leasing, sale and so on. In 1870, the committee for the Central Exhibition negotiated the purchase of this property from the church for $5000. Funding was supplied by the Town of Guelph, the South Wellington Agricultural Society, and a loan from the Imperial Loan Society of Toronto. Guelph now had its own Exhibition Grounds.

The question then was how to develop it. Of course, organizers needed structures and facilities to hold regional exhibitions. However, organizers also had their eye on hosting the Provincial Exhibition, a grand affair organized annually by the Agricultural Association of Ontario. The Association had a policy of limiting this Exhibition to big centres—Toronto, Kingston, London, Hamilton, and Ottawa—where facilities and population would (hopefully) support a big show and a good turnout.

To join this club, Guelph's organizers would need some substantial buildings. These would include plentiful stables, pens, and sheds, as well as halls able to house big exhibitions and office spaces. Primary among these would be main building capacious enough for multiple uses as well as tasteful enough to impress officials with the provincial organization. Construction, if not design, of the main building was entrusted to local builder Bernard McTague.

("Crystal Palace (Provincial Exhibition Building), London, Ontario," from the Canadian Illustrated News, 30 October 1875. Courtesy of Ivey Family London Room, London Public Library, London, Ontario, Canada; PG F70.)

There is no record explaining the reasoning behind the Palace's octagonal plan. Octagonal buildings were unusual (and remain so), the main example in the neighbourhood being the Speedside Church. In all likelihood, the organizers simply instructed McTague to imitate the Palace in the Exhibition grounds in London, Ontario, which had been built on an octagonal plan for London's Provincial Exhibition in 1861.

("Exterior view of the Crystal Palace after the building was relocated to Sydenham, South London, following the exhibition of 1851." Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.)

The reason that the building was called "the Palace" is not hard to guess. The Great Exhibition of London in 1851 featured a main building known as "the Crystal Palace" because it was essentially a giant greenhouse with an all-glass exterior. This structure set the precedent for subsequent exhibitions across the British empire, so that exhibition buildings in Toronto, Hamilton, London (Ontario) and so on were all referred to in this way. No exhibition worth its salt could be without one.

(This association also suggests that perhaps, like the Crystal Palace in London, the Palace in Exhibition Park had no foundation. Instead, it may simply have rested on a board pad, though no record I have makes any mention of this aspect of its design.)

("Guelph, Ont.—The Central Exhibition: Interior of the Rotunda.—By P.W. Canning." From the Canadian Illustrated News v. 10, n. 4, p. 213; 3 October 1874.)

The central portion of the Palace was 84 feet (25.6m) across while the four wings were each 40 by 60 feet (12 x 18m). The upper storey in the main portion provided an interior gallery, where people could walk around the inside of the building and take in some more refined exhibits, such as arts and Ladies' work. The City Directory for 1873 mentions that this building cost a substantial $9000 to put up!

Naturally, many other structures were required to house such large exhibitions. The Palace was initially accompanied by three smaller ones, one for agricultural implements, one for grains and roots, and a third for poultry. Besides these, a row of horse stables (600 feet/183m), a row of cattle pens (900 feet/275m), and a row of sheep and pig pens (500 feet/152m) were laid out. In addition, a fenced ring about 400 feet (122m) in diameter was constructed in front of the horse stalls, complete with a central judges stand, for exhibiting draft and carriage horses.

Other buildings were added (or repaired) over the years as required, including many for the Provincial Exhibition of 1883.

The entire park was enclosed in a board fence and an entrance built at the corner of London Road and Exhibition Street, where admission could be charged.

("Guelph.—Agricultural machinery at the Central Exhibition.—From a sketch by F.M. Bell Smith. Canadian Illustrated News, v. 6, n. 18, p. 285; 2 November 1872.

Exhibitions were held in the fall of 1871 and 1872. In his "Annals of the Town of Guelph," Burrows (1877) notes that both were a big success. The 1871 edition was held on October 10 through 12 and attracted 7000 entries from across Ontario. About 15,000 people attended each day and $8000 in prizes awarded altogether. The 1872 edition was held on October 1 through 4, and was a "magnificent success." Lt.-Governor Sir William Pearce Howland attended and gave an address that was received with enthusiasm.

Once the success of these home-grown exhibitions established the exhibition grounds in the local culture, serious thought was given to formalizing additional uses. In 1873, the Town Council adopted a bylaw setting out the rules. First, the name "the Central Exhibition Park" was adopted as the official moniker for the property. After some warm debate, the Council adopted a rule that the Park could be rented out for other uses, such as festivals, bazaars, or picnics, at their discretion. Fees were set at $20/day for the park plus buildings or $10/day for the buildings alone. Lessees were limited to charging 25 cents admission for events when the whole grounds were let. The grounds would remain open the general public as usual when only the buildings were let. Open hours for public use were set at 6 a.m. to 9 p.m. from 1 May to 30 September, and from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. from 15 October to 30 April. Provision was made for a caretaker to police these regulations.

A motion was made to forbid the selling of alcohol on premises. However, the motion was voted down. Temperance would not be the rule at Guelph's Exhibition grounds.

("Postcard, William A. Mahoney with Guelph Ball Club, 1912-1913." Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums, 2014.84.351.)

It took little time for community organizations to take advantage of the opportunities afforded by the new park. On 24 June 1874, for example, the St. Joseph's Hospital held a "Grand Charity pic-nic" on behalf of the Aged and Orphans in their care. Many games were on tap, including ten-pin bowling, foot ball, croquet, quoits, swings, merry-go-rounds, and many more. Naturally, the sporting centrepiece was a base ball game between the "world-champion" Maple Leafs and some selected locals. In the Palace, there would be a Grand Bazaar and an exciting Wheel of Fortune, where valuable prizes would be given to lucky winners.

("Exhibition Park, Guelph, Can." ca. 1910, featuring the park's bandstand. Postcard published by the International Stationary Company; from the author's collection.)

Musical entertainment would be provided by Lawrence’s Silver Cornet Band starting at noon.

("Horse racing in exhibition Park. There are two jockeys in buggies being pulled around a track. In the background are the large playing fields of Exhibition Park. There are some kids playing baseball on the field." ca. 1903. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums 2007.21.1, p. 11).

Perhaps the most interesting affair (after baseball) would be the horse races. It appears that a half-mile track had just been built around the central area of the park, permitting races to be held. On tap were (1) running, single dash, for horses that have never won public money, (2) trotting to harness, best two out of three heats, open to all horses, and (3) running, single dash, consolation stakes, $5, for horses beaten in first race. The entry fee was one dollar for each horse, with prizes of $10 for a first place finish, $7 for second, and $3 for third. For reasons of propriety, no betting was allowed.

("Exhibition grounds, Guelph, Can." Postcard published by the International Stationary Company, probably on the occasion of Old Home Week, 1913. Note the grandstand and race track on the right, parallel to Kathleen Street, the Poultry Building in the middle background, and the Palace to the left. From the author's collection.)

Countless other events were organized by community organizations. To mention just one more, an association of ex-Guelphites from Toronto visited their old haunts on 28 August 1893, foreshadowing the Old Home Week celebrations of the twentieth century. A train laden with eight cars of former residents arrived in the city, where they related tales of the good old days when wolves howled outside of people's doors and the like. After a warm reception at the C.P.R. station, the group made their way to Exhibition Park to celebrate in style. The weather turned rainy, so games were cancelled and the multitude made for the Palace. There a concert was given by the 30th Batallion Band until the time came for supper. At that point, 500 people were seated around seven large tables set out on the ground floor. A meal was served and devoured, toasts and speeches made, and then the visitors made their way back to the station to return to the Big Smoke.

("Artillery camp at Exhibition Grounds, fifty years ago," ca. 1875. Tents appear to be pitched inside the horse-judging ring. From the Guelph Evening Mercury Centennial Edition, 20 July 1927.)

Mention of the 30th Battalion band also points to the frequent use of the Park by local military units. In October 1873, for example, the 30th Battalion camped in the Park to hold its annual inspection there, under the watchful gaze of Col. French. On the first of October, they showed their stuff to the Colonel, performing artillery maneuvers in the horse ring. Their movements were disciplined and precise: Each gun was drawn by six horses and and followed by an ammunition wagon drawn by four more, so it would have been easy to get fowled up.

In the following year, the Battalion camped in the park once again and was joined by Battalions from Bruce and Perth Counties. Altogether, there were about 1200 personnel camped in the Park, along with all their artillery, gear and animals! Their disposition is described as follows (Mercury, 30 June 1874):

At the extreme north-west corner the tents of the 30th Battalion have been pitched. South of them the Bruce Battalion is located, on the same ridge. On the level ground east, and fronting the cattle sheds are the Waterloo and Perth Battalions. Between the main Exhibition Building and the horse stables are pitched the tents of the Wellington Field Battery, and here also their guns are placed. Towards the south end of the horse ring are the tents of the Brigade staff. Attached to each Battalion is a large tent for the officers’ mess: also a canteen, where no liquor stronger than beer is allowed to be sold. Eight men are allotted for each tent. The cooking arrangements are of the simplest and most primitive description. A square hole is dug in the ground, where the fire is placed, and pots, pans, &c., are suspended from a temporary fixture above in true gipsy fashion. The rations which are ample, are all supplied by requisition sent to the Supply Officer, and these again are re-divided among the companies and messes. The wells on the ground supply sufficient water for the whole camp. The tents belonging to each Battalion are generally laid out with great regularity, and look like a small town under canvass while the cooking and other domestic operations—the rushing to and fro of orderlies, the knots of men which here and there are seen eagerly discussing some question pertaining to the camp—make up a scene at once novel and full of interest.
This was likely the largest military encampment in the history of the park.
("Wellington Rifles" (30th Battalion), ca. 1885. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums, Grundy 154.)

So far as I am aware, the period of semi-regular military encampments in the park concluded with the celebration of the Queen's birthday (24 May, in case you've forgotten!) in 1888. On that occasion, the Artillery brigade was joined by the Royal Grenadiers of Toronto, by special invitation of Mayor A.H. Macdonald, then in command of the Guelph Artillery battalion. The Grenadiers were well-known for their particiation in the North-west Resistance (or North-west Rebellion), particularly at the Battle of Batoche in 1885. Eight companies of the Grenadiers were in town to participate in parades, maneuvers, and athletic events over a three-day period.

Interestingly, although provision was made for at least some soldiers to sleep in the "horticultural hall," many chose to room in local hotels instead. In any event, the officers of the Grenadiers were entertained with a special dinner laid on by the city in the wings of the Palace.

("34th [Infantry Battalion] in the Exhibition Grounds in Guelph," 19 May 1915. Courtesy of the Library and Archives Canada, 3403547.)

Military events continued to be held in the Park. During the Great War, for example, the 34th Battalion and 16th Field Artillery were given a send-off in the Park in May 1915. The band of the 153rd Battalion camped in the Park in July 1916 to receive well wishers and perform concerts. On 17 April 1917, the 64th Battery performed maneuvers in the Park that were recorded for movie men from Toronto. Alas, this footage seems not to have survived.

("Colours presentation to 153rd Battalion Wellington militia, Guelph, 1916." Dignitaries including local MP Hugh Guthrie and later-mayor Harry Westoby take in the proceedings. Courtesy of Wellington County Museum and Archives, A1955.19.16.)

Perhaps the most surprising events were re-enactments by veterans of prominent battles of the Great War, organized by the Great War Veterans Association (GWVA). For Dominion Day 1918, after a band concert and a display of Scotch and Irish dancing by four little girls, a number of veterans staged a re-enactment of the battle of Vimy Ridge, with fireworks supplying appropriate sound effects.

The next year, the GWVA organized a similar event, featuring musical and dance performances, a baseball game, a baby contest, etc., as well as a re-enactment of the storming of the Hindenburg Line. This, it seems, was an elaborate affair (Mercury, 2 July 1919):

It was a very realistic bombing attack, the men in khaki going over in two waves, and the bombs and artillery crawling in a way that gave the spectators a fair idea of what an attack meant in a small sector of the front.
There were casualties and prisoners, and Sergt. Dan Anderson led his troops with much dash. Sport Pearce, in complete Hun uniform, helmet, covercoat, even long top boots, was captured and taken back to the barb wire cage. Even the rum ration was in evidence for, after the objective was reached, the "tots" were dished out from the orthodox S.R.D. jar, the wounded receiving first attention, and though, of course, it was only "two percent," the boys seemed to relish it.
To add to the versimilitude of the occasion, plans were made to include a tank, although obstacles were encountered in the execution of this plan:
The tank arrived on the scene, according to schedule, but it was found impossible to get it into the grounds except by allowing it to use its natural method of smashing its way through all obstructions. The committee did not feel justified in allowing it to crash through the fences, as the Parks Committee might have considered that a little too realistic.
Battle re-enactments were not unheard of in celebrations of this sort but participation of a tank is, as far as I can tell, unique.
("Exhibition building, Guelph, Ont." Postcard published ca. 1910 for A.B. Petrie. Courtesy of the Keleher Collection.)

One thing that was different for the 1919 show than the year before was the absence of the Palace. At the outset of 1919, the City Council decided to demolish the main buildings in the Park and revise the fence arrangement. The wood and windows of the Palace were to be piled up in the park and sold off (Mercury, 13 March 1919). In the new arrangement, the southern section of the Park, next to London Road, would no longer be fenced in, so that public access was made much easier.

No reasons for this decision are noted in the Mercury. However, there were several reasons to do away with the Palace. First, it had been some time since it served its original purpose as a venue for indoor displays during exhibitions. The Provincial Exhibition, held in Guelph in 1883 and 1886, had been discontinued after its final hurrah in London, Ontario, in 1889. Simply put, it was a money loser and could not compete with profitable and annual events, especially the Toronto Industrial Exhibition (predecessor of the Canadian National Exhibition). Guelphites were happy to take the train to Toronto to see the "Ex" rather than try to host a periodic rival in town.

("Winter Fair Building, Guelph," postcard published for Henry Garner Living Picture Postcard Co., Leister England, ca. 1910. From the author's collection.)

Second, Guelph started its own, annual Provincial Winter Fair, starting in the year of the earlier fair's demise, 1889. A special Winter Fair building was constructed in the Market Square to accommodate this event. This arrangement was much more convenient, was focussed on agriculture, and made money.

("Exhibition Park," real photo postcard, possibly the 1916 visit of the 153rd Battalion. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums, 2014.84.476.)

So, the Palace had become something of a white elephant for the city and it was dismantled and removed in 1919, apparently with little fanfare. Today, as we look back, its presence is recalled only in old maps, drawings, and postcards.

Of course, there is lots more to say about the early days of Exhibition Park. Hopefully, future blog posts will explore this interesting topic.

("Guelph Maple Leaf ball player with 2 police officers, ?, Fred and Agnes McTague," ca. 1915. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums, 2017.1.36.)
Sources consulted include:

Wednesday, 4 June 2025

Guelph Stereoview display: until June 16!

Greetings, Guelph in postcards readers!
("Facade of St. Mark's, Venice Italy," ca. 1905. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums 1983.96.32.)

Stereoviews (or stereocards, stereographs, etc.) were a popular way of virtually travelling to exotic places. Seen through a stereoscope, stereocards simulated the experience of seeing something in 3D! Stereoviews featured paired images that were slightly offset from each other. A stereoscope presented each of the viewer's eyes with just one of the images, prompting a sense of depth perception.

("Stereoscope," ca. 1940. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.)

Several kinds of stereoscopes were developed to help people enjoy stereoviews but the simple Holmes design created by Oliver Wendel Holmes was inexpensive and widespread. (For those too impecunious or cheap to spring for a stereoscope, the 3D effect can be had by holding a stereoview before the eyes and crossing them until a single image forms.)

("Upper Wyndham Street, Guelph," ca. 1900. Published by Nerlich & Co.)

Combined with the development of inexpensive photo printing of stereocards, the stereoscope become a popular amusement in Victorian parlors.

("Model Farm, Ontario Agricultural College," ca. 1902. Photographed and Published by B.W. Kilburn, - Littleton, N.H. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums 2002.18.1.)

Many Guelphites accumulated veritable libraries of exotic stereoviews. Also, Guelph scenes were captured and presented for 3D thrills around the globe.

("Eramosa Road from the corner of Woolwich and Wellington Streets," ca. 1910. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Musems 1986.18.30.)

When view postcards came on the scene around the turn of the 20th century, some postcards were printed as stereoviews, typically with the same image repeated on either side of the front of a standard-sized card. These "poor man's" stereoviews were not as effective as the real ones but seemed to amuse some postcard customers.

Though the stereoview remained popular into the early 20th century (and was carried on in the form of the Viewmaster), the pastime has faded from memory. However, a selection of Guelph stereocards is now on display in the cabinet on the ground floor of the Guelph Public Library main branch.

Unfortunately, the display will remain in place only until June 16, so head down to the library soon to get a sense of how Guelph looked in former years in the virtual reality technology of the day.

Thanks to Roger Miller for leading the effort to create this display!


For those looking for more dope on the stereoscope, have a look at:

Monday, 19 May 2025

Mildred Fry, an excellent nurse

The letter, typed on Homewood Sanitarium letterhead, dated 13 October 1913, praises Mildred Fry as follows:
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
This is to certify that Miss Fry is a graduate of the Homewood, having taken a high standing in her class. She is an excellent nurse, and I can recommend her very highly to your good services. You will make no mistake in employing Miss Fry on any case that needs professional nursing.
A.T. Hobbs
Medical Superintendent
In addition, the letter came into my keeping with a set of real photo postcards, providing us with a portrait of Mildred and some of her family members.

Perhaps the most notable postcard is presumably of Mildred herself.

The picture shows Mildred in a crisp, white uniform, emphasizing her professional status. The open book on the table beside denotes the learning she has acquired in nursing school. It seems likely that this image was taken on (or near) her graduation in 1913. There is no caption or writing on the back but it seems safe to assume that this is Mildred herself.

Mildred Fry was born on 11 July 1892 in Dunnville, Ontario. Both the 1901 and 1911 Ontario censuses show the Fry family resident on a farm near Dawn, in west Lambton County. She was from a large family. Between them, the two censuses list the following children of Mildred's parents, Malcolm and Jessie: Della, Mildred, Ina, Francis, Ada, Burton, Dwight, Morley, and Jessie. A large family but not an uncommonly large one for the era.

Another real photo postcard in the set shows Mildred in a lovely, formal Edwardian dress, along with accessories including a nice hat, a pearl necklace, and a wristwatch. Very timely!

Next is a postcard with a message written on the back that identifies the woman in the image: "Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas // Della." So, the picture likely features Mildred's older sister Della with her husband Perry Sanderson, along with their two boys Nelson and Burton, as listed in the 1911 Census, which locates them on a farm near Dawn.

With this identification in mind, it is straightforward to identify the women in the postcard above as Mildred (seated) and Della. The ladies are dressed in very elegant later Edwardian summer attire. In particular, Mildred has full-length gloves and a generous hat pin. It is not unlikely that this attire belonged to the photographer, as they often had a closet of special clothing on hand for dressed-up photos.

Another photo shows a couple of young women dressed in nice, cool-weather clothing and photographed outdoors, seated on a log. The postcard is not labelled but the context suggests that they may be Mildred's younger sisters Ina and Ada.

There are a few more images in the set but the last one I will include here is one of a young man in military uniform. There is no notation on the back of the postcard to say who this is. However, a reasonable guess would be that it is Clark Francis Fry, one of Mildred's younger brothers. Records of the Canadian Expeditionary Force show that Francis signed up in January 1916 and shipped out overseas the following year. So, this image might date from some time in that interval. He served in the 18th Canadian Battalion, and was active with it during the climactic Hundred Days Offensive in 1918. Just after the Armistice, he caught the Spanish Flu and was sent to recover in hospital in England. He returned to Canada the following year and later moved to Lowell, Massachusetts, to start a new life in the textile industry there.

Mildred leaves a light imprint in historical records. The most substantial record that I have found is a description of graduation ceremony of the Homewood nursing students, class of 1913 (Mercury, 14 May). The ceremony took place at the Sanitarium on the evening of May 13. Dr. Hobbs praised the excellence of the graduates, followed by Dr. MacKinnon, who administered the Florence Nightengale vow, and Rev. H.E. Abraham, who presented the diplomas. The roll of graduates illustrates the kind and number of students in the program at the time:

Miss Fanel Claus, St. Thomas, Ont.
Miss Hannah McCann, Lucan, Ont.
Miss Myrtle Davison, Shelburne, Ont.
Miss Estelle E. Fuhr, Wyecombe, Ont.
Miss Margaret T. Bates, St. Ann’s, Ont.
Miss Blanch A. Smith, Iona, Ont.
Miss Mildred D. Fry, Petrolia, Ont.
Miss Josephine E. McGuire, Guysboro, N.S.
Each graduate was also presented with a bouquet of pink carnations and roses. The evening concluded with dancing.

In November, 1914, Mildred is mentioned in the London Advertiser as a delegate to the Women's Institute convention in that city, and is specifically identified as a delegate from Tupperville, a community in Chatham-Kent, where she resided on a farm on R.R. 2. So, it appears that Mildred did not pursue a career in nursing.

On 30 August 1919, Mildred married Fred Groombridge in Sarnia. The 1921 Census places the Groombridge family back in Mildred's old stomping grounds of Dawn. The family remained in this vicinity and Mildred died in 1958 and is buried in Petrolia.

Young women like Mildred were increasingly engaged with professional education and skills in the early 20th century. Jobs as shop clerks, stenographers, bookeepers, telephone operators, and more opened up opportunties for them in Canadian cities. Nursing was once such occupation.

In 19th century Anglo-American world, nursing was popularized by the famous Florence Nightengale, who treated soldiers injured in the conduct of the Crimean War. Efforts to professionalize nursing resulted in the establishment of nursing schools, starting in Toronto (1881) and Montreal (1890) in Canada.

In the realm of psychiatric care, the Rockwood Asylum in Kingston, Ontartio, was the first to establish a training school (1888) for what would be known as psychiatric nursing today. Professionalization of psychiatric nursing lagged behind that of medical nursing, perhaps due the subject's lower status. In this respect, Homewood was early to develop professional standards and schooling of psychiatric nurses. It adopted uniforms for its nurses in 1902, a signal of their distinction from simple, hired help. In 1906, Homewood opened its school.

("Main Drive, showing Manor and Colonial Building, Homewood Sanitarium, Guelph, Ont." ca. 1905. The message on the back reads, in part: "The picture is a lunatic asylum probably your future home. I’ll meet you there maybe." Publisher unknown.)

In a letter to Provincial Inspector Bruce Smith in 1913, the year of Mildred Fry's graduation, Superintendant Hobbs described the schooling at Homewood in this way (Warsh 1989, p. 115):

My graduate nurses ... undergo a training of two years and three months, undergo a strict course of lectures, and pass a very strict severe standard for their examinations.
Homewood offered a variety of treatment methods in that era, including occupational therapy (as it would be called today), amusements (such as sporting events offered on its extensive grounds), tonics, withdrawal therapy, gynaecological surgery, electrotherapy, hydrotherapy, the rest cure, the gold cure (a treatment for alcoholism), and a kind of chemotherapy. Nursing training would have involved learning and assisting in all of these theraputic regimes.

Nonetheless, graduates were not seen as equal to nurses with medical backgrounds and experienced difficulties in getting good jobs and professional status. (The Province of Ontario finally established professional accredidation for psychiatric nurses in 1922.)

As such, students like Mildred Fry provided inexpensive labour during their training but faced significant challenges in finding work in the profession upon graduation. Perhaps these challenges help to explain why Mildred returned to farm life shortly after her graduation from Homewood.


Works consulted for this post include:

Sunday, 30 March 2025

Happy Easter 1912 from Rev. W.H. Douglas!


The Guelph in Postcards blog has recently surpassed 500,000 unique views! Thanks everyone for dropping by and stay tuned for more! 🙏 🎉
Postcards in the heyday of the medium were used for many purposes. Today, we tend to associate them with travel; people send postcards to their friends and relations from places they have been. This use has always been common. As Gifford (2013) points out, postcards were commonly used to mark holidays as well. Easter was one such holiday.

Easter postcards often feature generic drawings of bunnies, churches, eggs, chicks and other familiar icons of the season. One such card is shown below.

("Easter greetings" published by Raphael Tuck & Sons, GEM Photochrome Series 3274, ca. 1915. Courtesy of Guelph Civic Museums 1967.1.294.)

However, for various reasons, people sometimes took it on themselves to make personalized holiday postcards. One such card is shown below:

In brief, the view is a family portrait in a classy, simulated oval frame. The figures are (from left to right) Mrs. Douglas (née Martha Torrance), Lennox Herbert Douglas, Wesley Ryerson Scott Douglas, and the Rev. William Herbert Douglas.

The back of the card provides an Easter greeting along with a seasonal message and identifies the addressee:

The addressees are Mr. & Mrs. McCarter & Myrtle.

Happily, the message identifies the date and place of the postcard's use: Rockwood, Ontario, 7 April 1912. It's interesting to note that, although the postcard was addressed, it was not sent through the mail. Instead, it was likely delivered by hand. Looking at the persons identified on the card helps to explain why.

So, the puzzle now becomes genealogical: Who were these people and how were they connected such that this postcard was prompted? Investigation yields some interesting answers.

The obvious place to start is with the good Reverend William Herbert Douglas. He was born on 8 March 1873 in Reach Township, Ontario (now part of Scugog Township), to Samuel and Jane Douglas, immigrants from Ireland. The 1891 census reveals that they were farmers and that, while Samuel was a follower of the Church of England, Jane was a Methodist, along with all the couple's children. The family had an academic bent: William's siblings John and Annie were occupied as teachers and his brother Thomas was a Methodist minister. So, it is not surprising that William followed a similar path.

A fulsome obituary in the Georgetown Herald (29 December 1937) provides more details:

Mr. Douglas commenced his ministry as a missionary to the Canadian West, subsequently returning to Ontario and offering himself as a candidate for the ministry at Jarvis, Ont. During his career he has ministered to the following congregations in Ontario: Jarvis, Trafalgar, Rockwood, Port Elgin, Canfield, Norval, Lynden, Port Robinson and finally Mount Pleasant.
The Minutes of the Toronto Methodist church (1900) note that William Douglas was ordained that year. The Acton Free Press (22 July 1909) reported that his first sermon in connection with the Rockwood circuit would be delivered at Siloam church shortly. Later reports suggest that it was warmly recieved.
("Churches of Rockwood, Ont., Canada." Published by the Valentine & Son Publishing Co., ca. 1915. Courtesy of Wellington County Museum A2009.135, ph. 31402. The Methodist church is in the upper right corner.)

Reports suggest that Rev. Douglas performed his duties ably, preaching sermons, conducting weddings and funerals, and, of course, celebrating Easter appropriately. On 23 November 1909, he preached a special sermon to the Christians while addressing the unconverted the next day. It is not reported how many non-believers were in attendance.

(Wedding photo of the Rev. W.H. Douglas and Martha Torrance, courtesy of Janice Masson. The couple was married on 6 June 1900 in Wentworth, Ontario.)

An article in 6 June 1912 Acton Free Press notes that the Reverend was on his way to a new parish on Port Elgin, so, not long after he sent out the Easter card above. He retired from the ministry in 1935 due to failing health and settled in Toronto, where he passed on in 1937.

("Lennox Herbert Douglas," no date. Courtesy of Janice Masson.)

The couple's first son, Lennox Herbert, was born on 6 April 1901 and grew up to become a doctor. He practiced in a number of Ontario communities, winding up in Galt (now part of Cambridge) Ontario, where he passed away in 1966. He married Margaret Vicars Kent of Truro, Nova Scotia, whose father Hedley practiced medicine there for nearly 50 years.

The couple second son (and only other child) Wesley Ryerson Scott was born on 4 February 1904. He married Mary Aileen Moore of Georgetown in 1932. A fulsome obituary in the Georgetown Herald supplies some details (23 September 1959):

Mr. Douglas was born in Kemble in the Bruce Peninsula where his father had a charge, his parents were Rev. and Mrs. W.H. Douglas. When Mr. Douglas served his charge in Norval his son attended Georgetown high school, later going to Victoria College, University of Toronto, graduating in 1929. While at college he played both rugby and hockey on the Victoria and Varsity teams.
For some time after his marriage in 1932, he taught in Northern Vocational School until he suffered a heart attack and was advised to leave the teaching profession. He later formed his own brokerage firm, Ryerson Douglas Securities on Bay Street. He and his family were members of the United Church.
So, he followed the family tradition of teaching, a profession that can be quite rigorous.

The attention paid to the Douglas family in the pages of the Georgetown Herald is partly explained by the fact that Wesley's wife Mary was a daughter of J.M. Moore, publisher and editor of that newspaper for more than 30 years. Both were buried in at the Greenwood Cemetery in Georgetown.

It seems appropriate to finish with a few words about the recipients of the postcard. Mr. Thomas and Mrs. Mary McCarter were Methodists and residents of Rockwood, where Thomas worked as a bailiff. Myrtle was born on 16 September 1898, and so was 14 years old when the McCarters received the postcard. In 1923, she married Harold Douglas Treleaven of Rockwood, who was a salesman. Eventually, the couple relocated to the Big Smoke.

So, we come back to the matter of why the postcard was addressed to the McCarters by the Douglas's. The McCarters likely belonged to the Methodist church in Rockwood. The purpose of the postcard was to reaffirm the place of both families in the local Methodist community. Holiday postcards were often used for this sort of thing.

Thanks again for being a part of the internet postcard community and, of course, Happy Easter!

("Loving Easter greetings" published by Raphael Tuck & Sons, GEM Photochrome Series 3274, ca. 1915.)
Sources used for this post include: